<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Icosahedron Polyhedra?-You Had Me At Icos&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.comingunmoored.com/2009/04/iscosahedron-polyhedrayou-isco/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.comingunmoored.com/2009/04/iscosahedron-polyhedrayou-isco/</link>
	<description>At last I had mastered the low art of coming unmoored. -- Joe Androe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:22:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.Kári Thomsen</title>
		<link>http://www.comingunmoored.com/2009/04/iscosahedron-polyhedrayou-isco/comment-page-1/#comment-1768</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.Kári Thomsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comingunmoored.com/?p=1216#comment-1768</guid>
		<description>Hi Cayenne
The Easy Domes polyhedra has its basic in  the icosahedron - 20 similar triangels. Even the traditional dome-houses seen past 20 30 years build in triangels also make use of the same Platonic polyhedra - the icosahedron. The difference from the triangeling system, where the struts carry the load, to the Easy Domes concept - where the triangels (6 to each hexagon and 5 to each pentagon)  are implemented into a  plane or plate structure, is to carry the load from top, crossing the edges and  downwards to the plint(basement.
Basic difference is: the geometrical triangel polyhedra made from the icosahedron is stable, while the Easy Domes plate-structure is unstable - without its plate.

The triangeling system has advantages - and big disadvantages being difficult to erect and as a very long time job to mount and finish - with advantages in no limits in size if the triangels have a high frequence. To this a dome can be built in several thousands of squaremeter.

The Easy Domes plate structure has big advantages if you think of building domes as family-domes or buildings upp to a few hundred squaremeter. It is easy to erect, quick to mount and you have no need for special connectors. The disadvantage is  that the building sections - hexagons, pentagons and quadrangels can not be too big. The weight gets to high, the sections difficult to transport and the strength of each sections makes also problems if it becomes too big.

So - buckuball, soccerball - or football......it is actually called a Truncated Icosahedron.

The fifth figure of Platon, or the carbon molocule....you will find the figure in natur environment from micro to small to big examples......

God luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Cayenne<br />
The Easy Domes polyhedra has its basic in  the icosahedron &#8211; 20 similar triangels. Even the traditional dome-houses seen past 20 30 years build in triangels also make use of the same Platonic polyhedra &#8211; the icosahedron. The difference from the triangeling system, where the struts carry the load, to the Easy Domes concept &#8211; where the triangels (6 to each hexagon and 5 to each pentagon)  are implemented into a  plane or plate structure, is to carry the load from top, crossing the edges and  downwards to the plint(basement.<br />
Basic difference is: the geometrical triangel polyhedra made from the icosahedron is stable, while the Easy Domes plate-structure is unstable &#8211; without its plate.</p>
<p>The triangeling system has advantages &#8211; and big disadvantages being difficult to erect and as a very long time job to mount and finish &#8211; with advantages in no limits in size if the triangels have a high frequence. To this a dome can be built in several thousands of squaremeter.</p>
<p>The Easy Domes plate structure has big advantages if you think of building domes as family-domes or buildings upp to a few hundred squaremeter. It is easy to erect, quick to mount and you have no need for special connectors. The disadvantage is  that the building sections &#8211; hexagons, pentagons and quadrangels can not be too big. The weight gets to high, the sections difficult to transport and the strength of each sections makes also problems if it becomes too big.</p>
<p>So &#8211; buckuball, soccerball &#8211; or football&#8230;&#8230;it is actually called a Truncated Icosahedron.</p>
<p>The fifth figure of Platon, or the carbon molocule&#8230;.you will find the figure in natur environment from micro to small to big examples&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>God luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://www.comingunmoored.com/2009/04/iscosahedron-polyhedrayou-isco/comment-page-1/#comment-877</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comingunmoored.com/?p=1216#comment-877</guid>
		<description>Cayenne, thanks for letting us know.  I&#039;ll ask Lynn to correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cayenne, thanks for letting us know.  I&#8217;ll ask Lynn to correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cayenne</title>
		<link>http://www.comingunmoored.com/2009/04/iscosahedron-polyhedrayou-isco/comment-page-1/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>cayenne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comingunmoored.com/?p=1216#comment-875</guid>
		<description>Um, it&#039;s not an icosahedron.  Icosahedra are made of 20 triangles.  It&#039;s part of a buckyball or whatever you want to call a soccerball shape of pentagons and hexagons.  And polyhedra just means 3d shapes with flat sides, so is redundant if you&#039;ve already specified the particular polyhedron (icosahedron or whichever.)

Actually the logo on their site is an icosohedron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, it&#8217;s not an icosahedron.  Icosahedra are made of 20 triangles.  It&#8217;s part of a buckyball or whatever you want to call a soccerball shape of pentagons and hexagons.  And polyhedra just means 3d shapes with flat sides, so is redundant if you&#8217;ve already specified the particular polyhedron (icosahedron or whichever.)</p>
<p>Actually the logo on their site is an icosohedron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.574 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-11 03:17:06 -->

